How We Can Stop The WHO's Horrific Pandemic Treaty
Reviewing exactly what is inside the worst treaty of our lifetime and the heroic efforts that are stopping it.
Story at a Glance:
•“Preventing” pandemics is one of the most lucrative areas in medicine. Unfortunately, despite all the money this industry has received, it has only made the problem worse. This is because most pandemics are the result of lab leaks from “preventative” research, and because whenever an effective solution is discovered for a pandemic, it gets suppressed by the industry since so many business interests depend upon profiting off of an “unsolvable emergency.”
•The way COVID-19 was handled was so egregious that it woke much of the public up to this grift. Because of that, the pandemic-industrial complex is now facing an existential risk to its business model (since much of the general population no longer is willing to go along with it).
•To solve this problem, a covert WHO treaty has been put together behind the scenes which gives these international health agencies absolute control over anything related to an alleged “health emergency,” and in turn enshrines each awful policy which was conducted throughout COVID-19 (e.g., mass censorship or the promotion of dangerous and experimental vaccines).
•A grass roots activist movement has accomplished something remarkable—despite the fact every single large organization has pushed the pandemic treaty through, in only a few short months, those activists have begun to derail it. I believe stopping this power grab is one of the most important issues of our time, and this article was written to explain exactly what they are doing so that each of us can help be a part of making sure this abhorrent treaty is never ratified.
There is a longstanding problem of natural and non-natural diseases leaking (or being deliberately released) from biolabs. These leaks are quite common and periodically, leaks with grave consequences occur
(e.g., RSV, H1N1, HIV, Smallpox, Anthrax, Lyme, SARS, Ebola and
SARS-CoV-2 [the virus which caused COVID-19]). Remarkably, prior to the
unprecedented censorship of COVID-19, scientists actively spoke out
against weaponizing viruses in labs (known as gain of function or GoF
research) and in response to public pressure, in 2014 Obama banned it,
but only for 3 types of viruses: SARS, MERS and bird flu.
Note:
bacteria diseases (e.g., Lyme and anthrax) are sometimes weaponized as
well, but these actions are typically not associated with the term
“GoF.”
In the first part of this series, I attempted to shed light on the vast pandemic “prevention” industry that the world’s eyes were opened to during COVID-19.
Briefly, to summarize that article, this racket:
•Has convinced the world that we face an existential risk of a dangerous new infectious disease jumping from wild animals to the human population and then wiping out humanity.
•Has pivoted to trying to
convince the world that the root cause of the increasing frequency of
these diseases is not their leaky biolabs, but rather climate change and
human encroachment on nature.
•Uses the fear of a
pandemic that might wipe out humanity to justify invasive surveillance
of every aspect of our lives and drum up a lot of money to “fix” the
problem. That money is then spent on scouring the world for potentially
dangerous diseases (after which animals infected with them will be
brought back to labs) developing countermeasures for these pathogens,
and performing genetic engineering (GoF) on existing viral diseases to
make them more deadly in order to be able to better understand how
future pandemic viruses might behave.
Note: as discussed in the first of the half of this series,
once a pandemic actually emerges, the effective countermeasures that
were developed (e.g., hydroxychloroquine for SARS) typically never see
the light of day as anything which “ends” a pandemic (rather than just
marginally treating it) destroys the lucrative sales market created by
the pandemic—which is unacceptable for the medical-industrial complex.
In short (like many other areas in medicine), the pandemic racket actually creates the problem it exists to “fix,” and typically fails to even do that because its focus is always on how to make as much money as possible rather than solving the problem.
Fortunately,
things are starting to change because much of the public now recognizes
how egregious the COVID-19 response was. For example:
•Everyday citizens are aware COVID-19 came from GoF research in Wuhan.
•They
saw how bad policies were repeatedly propped up (e.g., remdesivir and
lockdowns) while good ones were buried (e.g., all the off-patent
therapies which effectively treated COVID-19).
•Polling has repeatedly shown
roughly half of America believes the vaccines were unsafe and
ineffective, while a quarter directly know someone (e.g., themselves)
who had a significant injury they attribute to the vaccines.
•Many
can now see the trillions we spent on the COVID-19 response produced a
result which was actually worse than doing absolutely nothing (best demonstrated by the WHO’s finding that the less
countries complied with their instructions, the lower the COVID-19
death rates were—which is truly remarkable given that the “compliant”
nations collectively spent trillions enacting the WHO’s guidelines).
Most
importantly, the extreme censorship needed to maintain this racket
radicalized many moderates who previously would have been politically
apathetic. This allowed the alternative media to thrive during COVID-19
(while conversely mass layoffs are hitting the mainstream media).
Because of this, those opposed to the pandemic policies now have a
large platform much of the public will listen to, and unlike any era in
America’s past, the existing propaganda methods (e.g., having everyone
in the mass media repeat the same dishonest talking point) no longer
have the ability to effectively suppress narratives which compete with
the pandemic racket.
This situation thus represents an existential threat to the pandemic cartel and the enormous amount of money which had been invested into being able to sell every product they pushed onto the public (e.g., endless experimental mRNA vaccines) after their next fear campaign was rolled out.
In the previous article, I argued that the correct response to this new political reality would be to some extent come clean about the mistakes they’ve made and pivot to doing things which could prevent future pandemics (definitively ending all GoF research or putting laws in place which protected the public's right to access repurposed drugs that could treat novel diseases).
However, doing that would require everyone invested in the industry to lose a lot of money (e.g., all scientists and academics whose careers depend upon grants for GoF research or emergency pharmaceuticals). So, an alternative option was needed which much of the world recently became aware of thanks to Bret Weinstein’s recent interview:
Πηγή:https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/how-we-can-stop-the-whos-horrific
